Comparison

Service vs. in-house photogrammetry

Decision support for teams with recurring projects: when an internal stack makes sense and when a service workflow is the safer choice.

When service wins

when turnaround, QA, and planning-ready handoffs matter more than tool ownership

when projects arrive in bursts instead of a stable internal workload

when sales, planning, and delivery should not maintain their own reconstruction pipeline

When in-house wins

when a team handles high volume continuously under stable standards

when hardware, software, process ownership, and internal expertise already exist

when raw data, modeling, and QA must remain fully in-house anyway

Decision logic

1

Do not compare licenses alone; include staff time, QA, support, and ramp-up cost.

2

Check whether the real goal is owning a modeling stack or simply receiving reliable handoffs for downstream work.

3

When stakeholders need fast, repeatable outputs, operational simplicity often beats theoretical tooling flexibility.